0.07/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 07:22:39 EDT 2024
0.12/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.20/0.47	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.20/0.50	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xzgkClOeBi/E---3.1_5067.p
0.56/0.56	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.56/0.56	# Preprocessing class: HSMMSLSSLLLNHFA.
0.56/0.56	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.56/0.56	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores
0.56/0.56	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.56/0.56	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 180s (1) cores
0.56/0.56	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
0.56/0.56	# new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 5238 completed with status 0
0.56/0.56	# Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
0.56/0.56	# Preprocessing class: HSMMSLSSLLLNHFA.
0.56/0.56	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.56/0.56	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores
0.56/0.56	# No SInE strategy applied
0.56/0.56	# Search class: HGHSS-FFSF32-SHFMMMBN
0.56/0.56	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.56/0.56	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 405s (1) cores
0.56/0.56	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 91s (1) cores
0.56/0.56	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 102s (1) cores
0.56/0.56	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 102s (1) cores
0.56/0.56	# Starting lpo8_s with 102s (1) cores
0.56/0.56	# new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 5263 completed with status 9
0.56/0.56	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 98s (1) cores
0.56/0.56	# lpo8_s with pid 5267 completed with status 9
0.56/0.56	# post_as_ho10 with pid 5261 completed with status 0
0.56/0.56	# Result found by post_as_ho10
0.56/0.56	# Preprocessing class: HSMMSLSSLLLNHFA.
0.56/0.56	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.56/0.56	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores
0.56/0.56	# No SInE strategy applied
0.56/0.56	# Search class: HGHSS-FFSF32-SHFMMMBN
0.56/0.56	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.56/0.56	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 405s (1) cores
0.56/0.56	# Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.56/0.56	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.56/0.56	
0.56/0.56	# Proof found!
0.56/0.56	# SZS status Theorem
0.56/0.56	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.56/0.56	thf(decl_sort1, type, term: $tType).
0.56/0.56	thf(decl_sort2, type, subst: $tType).
0.56/0.56	thf(decl_26, type, id: subst).
0.56/0.56	thf(decl_64, type, hoasinduction_lem0: $o).
0.56/0.56	thf(decl_106, type, hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime: (subst > term > subst > $o) > (term > $o) > $o).
0.56/0.56	thf(decl_114, type, hoasinduction_lem0_lthm: $o).
0.56/0.56	thf(decl_144, type, epred1_0: subst > term > subst > $o).
0.56/0.56	thf(decl_145, type, esk1_1: (term > $o) > term).
0.56/0.56	thf(hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime, axiom, ((hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime)=(^[X14:subst > term > subst > $o, X9:term > $o]:(![X10:term]:(((X9 @ X10)<=>(X14 @ id @ X10 @ id)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xzgkClOeBi/E---3.1_5067.p', hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime)).
0.56/0.56	thf(hoasinduction_lem0, axiom, ((hoasinduction_lem0)<=>![X15:subst > term > subst > $o]:(?[X9:term > $o]:((hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime @ X15 @ X9)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xzgkClOeBi/E---3.1_5067.p', hoasinduction_lem0)).
0.56/0.56	thf(hoasinduction_lem0_lthm, axiom, ((hoasinduction_lem0_lthm)<=>(hoasinduction_lem0)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xzgkClOeBi/E---3.1_5067.p', hoasinduction_lem0_lthm)).
0.56/0.56	thf(thm, conjecture, (hoasinduction_lem0_lthm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xzgkClOeBi/E---3.1_5067.p', thm)).
0.56/0.56	thf(c_0_4, plain, ((hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:subst > term > subst > $o, Z1:term > $o]:(![X10:term]:(((Z1 @ X10)<=>(Z0 @ id @ X10 @ id)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime])).
0.56/0.56	thf(c_0_5, axiom, ((hoasinduction_lem0)=(![X15:subst > term > subst > $o]:(?[X9:term > $o]:((![X1037:term]:(((X9 @ X1037)<=>(X15 @ id @ X1037 @ id)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[hoasinduction_lem0, c_0_4])).
0.56/0.56	thf(c_0_6, axiom, ((hoasinduction_lem0_lthm)=((![X2664:subst > term > subst > $o]:(?[X2665:term > $o]:((![X2666:term]:(((X2665 @ X2666)<=>(X2664 @ id @ X2666 @ id))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[hoasinduction_lem0_lthm, c_0_5])).
0.56/0.56	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(![X3373:subst > term > subst > $o]:(?[X3374:term > $o]:(![X3375:term]:(((X3374 @ X3375)<=>(X3373 @ id @ X3375 @ id)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]), c_0_6])).
0.56/0.56	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X3389:term > $o]:(((~(X3389 @ (esk1_1 @ X3389))|~(epred1_0 @ id @ (esk1_1 @ X3389) @ id))&((X3389 @ (esk1_1 @ X3389))|(epred1_0 @ id @ (esk1_1 @ X3389) @ id)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])).
0.56/0.56	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X6:term > $o]:(((X6 @ (esk1_1 @ X6))|(epred1_0 @ id @ (esk1_1 @ X6) @ id))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.56/0.56	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X6:term > $o]:((~((X6 @ (esk1_1 @ X6)))|~((epred1_0 @ id @ (esk1_1 @ X6) @ id)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.56/0.56	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ id @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:term]:((epred1_0 @ id @ Z0 @ id)))) @ id), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.56/0.56	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_11])]), ['proof']).
0.56/0.56	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.56/0.56	# Parsed axioms                        : 238
0.56/0.56	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.56/0.56	# Initial clauses                      : 128
0.56/0.56	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 124
0.56/0.56	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
0.56/0.56	# Processed clauses                    : 14
0.56/0.56	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.56/0.56	# ...subsumed                          : 2
0.56/0.56	# ...remaining for further processing  : 12
0.56/0.56	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.56/0.56	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.56/0.56	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.56/0.56	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.56/0.56	# Generated clauses                    : 19
0.56/0.56	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
0.56/0.56	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.56/0.56	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.56/0.56	# Paramodulations                      : 7
0.56/0.56	# Factorizations                       : 2
0.56/0.56	# NegExts                              : 0
0.56/0.56	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.56/0.56	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.56/0.56	# Total rewrite steps                  : 1
0.56/0.56	# ...of those cached                   : 0
0.56/0.56	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.56/0.56	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.56/0.56	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.56/0.56	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.56/0.56	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.56/0.56	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.56/0.56	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.56/0.56	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.56/0.56	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.56/0.56	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.56/0.56	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.56/0.56	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.56/0.56	# Current number of processed clauses  : 8
0.56/0.56	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.56/0.56	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
0.56/0.56	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.56/0.56	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
0.56/0.56	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
0.56/0.56	# ...number of literals in the above   : 8
0.56/0.56	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.56/0.56	# Current number of archived clauses   : 4
0.56/0.56	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
0.56/0.56	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
0.56/0.56	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.56/0.56	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.56/0.56	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.56/0.56	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
0.56/0.56	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.56/0.56	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.56/0.56	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.56/0.56	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 27210
0.56/0.56	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 1662
0.56/0.56	
0.56/0.56	# -------------------------------------------------
0.56/0.56	# User time                : 0.032 s
0.56/0.56	# System time              : 0.019 s
0.56/0.56	# Total time               : 0.052 s
0.56/0.56	# Maximum resident set size: 5868 pages
0.56/0.56	
0.56/0.56	# -------------------------------------------------
0.56/0.56	# User time                : 0.052 s
0.56/0.56	# System time              : 0.036 s
0.56/0.56	# Total time               : 0.089 s
0.56/0.56	# Maximum resident set size: 2072 pages
0.56/0.56	% E---3.1 exiting
0.56/0.56	% E exiting
0.56/0.56	EOF